Feb 01, 2004
14:18 EST
 U.S.
 China
 World
 Opinion
 Law
 Life
 Health
 Business
 Science
 Sports
 
Epoch Times Exclusive articles
HOT TOPICS
2004 US Elections 
Falun Gong 
Inaugural Chinese New Year Gala 
Bird Flu 
Iraq 
Protests in China 
Du Daobin 
SARS 
Taiwan Referendum 
Israel-Palestine 
Yuan Valuation 
India-Pakistan 
Home > China > 

Forced Eviction and Demolition Continues after New Year

The Epoch Times

Jan 13, 2004


Ding Xunhua stands at the site of his demolished residence. Epoch Times Resource Room

Standing on the ruins of his demolished residence, 53-year-old Shanghai resident Ding Xunhua vows to continue legal appeals to demand the justice and the protection of rights that he says he deserves.

Without warning on the afternoon of Jan. 7, 2004, Ding’s residence was forcibly reduced to a pile of rubble.

“I knew that resistance was useless and I could only passively watch as my residence tumbled down,” he said.

In 2003, after negotiations with the government housing administration office failed, he sued the office and subsequently lost two lawsuits. He has now appealed to a higher court.

In 2003, around 100,000 Shanghai houses were demolished. Since 1990 Shanghai has demolished 40 million square meters of old houses, forcibly evicting about 2.5 million people in the process. The human toll from the demolitions manifesting in conflicts, suicide and self-immolation has emerged again and again throughout China.

Nearly 20 provinces and cities have modified their codes relating to eviction and demolition. The Construction Department of the Chinese government recently issued guidelines aimed at standardizing the evaluation of residences for demolition and protecting the legal rights for those whose houses are to be demolished. This document was to be officially executed on Jan.1, 2004. Moreover, in a recommendation for modifying the Constitution to the National People’s Standing Committee, the Chinese Communist Party clearly pointed out that, “citizens’ legal personal properties cannot be impinged upon” and “for the sake of public beneficial needs, the nation can collect or confiscate personal properties, but should give compensation” should be written into Constitution.

Ding sounds skeptical, “What I worry about is, will the home owner really have any true rights? And will the compensation be enough for me to buy another place of my own? After they rebuild here, I won't be able to afford living in this part of the city.”


Chinese Version | About Us | Contact Us |  Email Editor
Copyright 2003 Epochtimes